Irregularities and political decisions in ISO DIS 29500 March 2008 votes:
In a steering committee of 20 people a vote was taken to answer this question: "did the process run according to the rules and without irregularities?"
6 answered no and 7 abstained!
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-49525/limited-choice-at-german-din [noooxml.org] http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2008032913190768
21 members of the committee voted NO to fast-track this DIS but it was decided to vote yes anyway.
The technical committee didn't agree to change the disapproval vote but it was "decided" to vote yes anyway.
The committee S-142/U-34 under Danish Standards could not agree to change their vote from No to Yes.
A couple of hours later:
http://www.version2.dk/artikel/6718 says that the announcement from Danish Standards will not be made until Friday and that the Chair of the committee has been barred from speaking about the result of yesterday's meeting.
After some Microsoft political intervention to revert this ( the Prime Minister of Denmark is a Microsoft friend ), we have this: http://www.en.ds.dk/4227
Another political decision, influenced by Microsoft lobbyists.
The Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation decided on Malaysia's final position on OOXML ("abstain" ), overturning the 81% "Disapprove" position by ISC-G and TC4.
On March 20, 2008, Technical Committee (KT 182) of PKN was supposed to either accept the recommendation (which was to vote YES for the proposed standard) or not accept it, and thus recommend PKN to vote NO or abstain from voting. Of 45 members, 24 appeared on the meeting. And the votes looked like this:
- 12 votes supporting the reccomendation,
- 10 votes rejecting it,
- 2 abstaining to vote.
No consensus has been achieved concerning the recommendation. Thus, the chairman of KT 182, Elzbieta Andrukiewicz, decided to allow the missing members to vote by e-mail during the next 10 days (till the end of March).
The email vote was taken, counting a "no mail sended" as an "approval" !!!
Clearly, there was no technical consensus in Poland, but the chairman forced the rules to favour an approval.
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-49455/polish-chairwoman-distributes-microsoft-propaganda http://polishlinux.org/poland/possible-manipulation-around-ooxml-process-in-poland/ http://polishlinux.org/poland/poland-confirms-its-approval-for-ooxml-in-iso/
Out of 35 members of TO Z1, 17 sent a vote, and there were three votes for, and fourteen against fast-tracking OOXML, which is relative rejection rate of 82%. Members who voted were individual experts, IBM, CLUG and HrOpen. However, since there were less than 51% of votes, the voting process was declared invalid, and the previous vote holds ( "approve" ) !
Microsoft Croatia heavily influenced the voting, arguing that there's no need for a second round and accusing commitee conveners of incompetence.
The technical committee Incits/V1 was heavily stacked by Microsoft partners.
The chairman Hans-Rudolf Thomann systematically blocked the technical opposition to the DIS, virtually deciding Switzerland position himself.
New infamous JTC 1 P-members
Accepted a few days before DIS 29500 ballot closing, who joined ISO JTC1 just to cast a "yes vote":
Shameful. This is how ISO is delivering IT standards to the world, ignoring any technical analysis and accountability in NB decisions.